Changing places

Every spring I can't help but shake the feeling that a small - OK, MAJOR - change would be great for high school sports.
Instead of trying to play what are essentially are warm weather sports - baseball, softball and golf - in the spring, why don't we play them in the fall.
My rationale is this: You can play soccer in sloppy, wet, cold and miserable conditions. But baseball, softball and golf are sports where warm weather produces the best play. Therefore, why not move soccer to the spring and these other sports to the fall.
Another argument for the switch has to do with pitching. Many high school baseball players also play during the summer for Legion or Babe Ruth teams. They would come into a fall season fully prepared to play their best. Now, pitchers have been at it for two or three weeks before they hit the muddy mounds of spring. This not only increases the risk of injury - or at least sore arms - but it also can limit their effectiveness.
The same can be said for golf - most high school golfers hone their skills all summer long. Wouldn't the play in the fall be significantly better? It would stand to reason.
Critics might say that at the end of the fall the weather is roughly the same as the start of the spring. This is true, but it neglects the fact that the spring sports season is only six weeks long, not eight like in the fall. If we kept the season at the same length, then the finals would be in mid-to-late October. Given that fact and the fact that it is quite likely that after UVM buries its baseball team this summer that the state championships might be moved to another location, wouldn't make sense to have the state finals played south of Rutland - where it can be argued the chances for good weather in late October is greater?
Of course, the logistics of the switch probably make this a moot point to raise, but since when has that stopped me from giving my two cents.
What do you think about a switch?
If you would like to weigh in on a poll I have on the subject, click here.